ERISA

Forfeiture Claims: Copycats?

09.05.2024

 

Claims focused on “failed fiduciary process” related to the use of plan forfeitures  continue to bubble up. With the lawsuits winding through federal courts, it’s too early to know if they will trigger the same flow of copycat cases that has swirled up over fees and investments, but it’s wise for plan sponsors to be alert and take precautions.

 

Reviewing Plan Documents

As the trickle of lawsuits accusing retirement plans “of misusing forfeited retirement funds to pay for future employer contributions,” continues, ERISA defense attorneys advise plan sponsors to proactively review the forfeiture provisions in their plan documents. Specifically, as Plan Sponsor reports:

 

Michael Schloss, of counsel at the Wagner Law Group, says use of forfeiture amounts

is “built into the structure of these types of plans.” In a law alert from his firm…Schloss also wrote that “consideration should be given to whether fiduciary decisions relating to forfeitures could be seen as relieving the employer of an obligation to the plan and imposing additional costs on participants and whether action should be taken now that might mitigate any litigation risk going forward.”

 

The Wagner alert came just days after a new fiduciary breach suit was filed against retailer Nordstrom Inc., citing use of forfeitures, the costs of a managed account service and excessive recordkeeping fees,  and shortly after the revival of an earlier forfeiture case against HP Inc., which was initially dismissed…. The new case…was filed… in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. The plaintiffs are seeking class action status.

Essentially, this latest lawsuit claims that those responsible for the defined contribution plan failed to fulfill their fiduciary duties to prudently and loyally ensure the Plan’s total recordkeeping and other administrative expenses were reasonable and not excessive, as well as engaged in self-dealing with regard to Plan forfeitures in violation of ERISA fiduciary prohibited transaction rules.As federal judges dig into several similar ERISA allegations which are now in motion related to the appropriate use of forfeitures, Schloss observes that they “will have to sort out how those funds fit into the fiduciary duties of prudence and loyalty set out in Title I of ERISA…,” and believes, ultimately, “this can be resolved in plan documents.”

 

Good To Know–and Do

If you are a plan sponsor, and you do not know what your plan document says about the use of forfeitures, it’s a very good idea to find out. At the National Association of Plan Advisors, Jenny Kiffmeyer  points out that plan documents typically provide for accumulated forfeitures to be used in one of these three ways: 

 

 

  • Pay certain plan expenses;
  • Reduce employer contributions; or

 

  • Be allocated as additional employer contributions

 

Carol Buckmann, ERISA attorney at Cohen & Buckmann advises: The Department of Labor has never objected to the longstanding IRS position on plan forfeitures, but it is important that plan sponsors authorize the use of forfeitures in their plan’s language.” It’s also wise for plan sponsors to double down on the consistent and documented use of prudent processes related to the application of forfeitures to offset employer contributions. Although the emergence of ERISA litigation concerning long-standing protocols for forfeitures is surprising, it’s important for plan sponsors to be mindful that 

If even one of the allegations passes the motion to dismiss stage of legal proceedings, copycats are likely to follow–and fast. 

 

Experts continue to agree that protection is a smart way to mitigate the many risks inherent with plan sponsorship:“Entrepreneurial-minded attorneys are flocking to uncover breaches of fiduciaries’ ERISA duty….Fiduciary liability insurance is an indispensable measure to ensure sponsors and their businesses are protected with defense costs and penalty limits.”  Colonial Surety is here to help, making fiduciary liability insurance affordable for every plan sponsor. Armed with our coverage, if you face claims of alleged or actual breaches of duty in connection with the employee retirement plan, you’ll be protected with defense costs and penalty limits up to $1,000,000. Uniquely, Colonial even includes Cyber Liability Insurance, locks in multi-year rates and offers installation payments. Conveniently, our Fiduciary With Cyber liability package is now available with a one year commitment. Protect yourself, your business and plan, for a few dollars a day, now: 

 

Fiduciary With Cyber Liability Insurance Right Here.

 

Colonial Surety Company is rated “A Excellent” by A.M. Best Company, U.S. Treasury listed and in business all across the country. Serving customers since 1930, we are the trusted source for the pension industry to secure legally required ERISA bonds, fiduciary liability insurance and cyber-liability insurance. We help safeguard plan sponsors, pension professionals and financial advisors — and keep their businesses compliant — with pain-free, efficient, and friendly service every time.